Topic: Route Redistribution
r1 is running EIGRP and RIP:
r1#sh ip proto sum
Index Process Name
0 connected
1 static
2 eigrp 100
3 rip
r1 has the following EIGRP routes:
r1#sh ip route eigrp
2.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D 2.2.2.2 [90/2297856] via 10.1.12.2, 00:01:06, Serial1/0.12
22.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D EX 22.2.2.2 [170/2560512256] via 10.1.12.2, 00:00:23, Serial1/0.12
r1’s network admin wants to redistribute the EIGRP routes and pass them on to r3 in the RIP domain (directly connected to r1). Here is his configuration:
r1(config)#route-map EIGRP->RIP perm 10
r1(config-route-map)#match route-type external
r1(config-route-map)#set tag 1170
r1(config-route-map)#route-map EIGRP->RIP perm 20
r1(config-route-map)#set tag 190
r1(config-route-map)#router rip
r1(config-router)#redistribute eigrp 100 route-map EIGRP->RIP
Which EIGRP routes will appear in r3’s (RIP) routing table?
Yesterday’s Question
Question Of The Day: 25 March, 2008
Topic: EIGRP
Which of the following commands will make EIGRP AS 100 consider delay only when calculating the EIGRP metric?
1) router eigrp 100
default metric 1 1 0 1 15002) router eigrp 100
metric weights 0 1 0 0 0 03) router eigrp 100
metric weights 0 0 1 0 0 04) router eigrp 100
metric weights 0 0 0 1 0 0
Answer:
4) router eigrp 100
metric weights 0 0 0 1 0 0
metric weights tos k1 k2 k3 k4 k5
The first value is ‘tos’ (Type of Service) and is always zero. The remaining five values are the EIGRP ‘k-values’.
If k5 equals 0, the composite EIGRP metric is computed according to the following formula:
metric = [k1 * bandwidth + (k2 * bandwidth)/(256 - load) + k3 * delay]
If k5 does not equal zero, an additional operation is performed:
metric = metric * [k5/(reliability + k4)]
The ‘trick’ is not assuming that the five k-values match up with the five EIGRP metrics:
default-metric bandwidth delay reliability loading mtu
The five EIGRP metrics (which I memorized with the mnemonic “Big Dogs Really Love Meat”) do NOT correspond to the k-values. So don’t do what I did and use ‘metric weights 0 0 1 0 0 0′
[...] by Question Of The Day: 26 March, 2008 « CCIE Pursuit — March 26, 2008 @ 6:16 [...]
Pingback by Question Of The Day: 25 March, 2008 « CCIE Pursuit — March 26, 2008 @ 6:20 am |
[...] Answer [...]
Pingback by Question Of The Day: 25 March, 2008 « CCIE Pursuit — March 26, 2008 @ 6:20 am |
[...] Question Of The Day: 26 March, 2008 [...]
Pingback by Question Of The Day: 27 March, 2008 « CCIE Pursuit — March 27, 2008 @ 6:02 am |